BTC

Guide

Bitcoin's Four-Year Cycle Explained: The Halving–Price Relationship, Neutrally Tested Against Past Data

ビットコインの4年サイクルとは|半減期と相場の関係を過去データで中立検証
写真: Pixabay / CC0

The Bottom Line

Bitcoin's "four-year cycle" is the observed pattern in which the market has repeatedly moved through "rally → peak → decline → bottom → rally again," starting from the halving (the event that cuts the rate of new coin issuance in half) that occurs roughly every four years. In fact, after each of the past three halvings (2012, 2016, and 2020), Bitcoin went on to set a new all-time high within about 12 to 18 months, then fell sharply. But this is only a historical tendency — not a law and not a guarantee. Since 2024 in particular, institutional money flowing in through exchange-traded funds (ETFs) has become a major driver of price, so be sure to keep in mind that "the next cycle" may not look the same.

Key points of this article

- The engine behind the four-year cycle is the hypothesis of a "supply shock from the halving." Roughly every 210,000 blocks (≈4 years), new issuance is cut in half.

- In all three previous cycles, the market peaked 12 to 18 months after the halving, then bottomed the following year — a pattern that repeated.

- It is true that supply falls, but the causal link to a rising price has not been proven. Prices only rise when demand and the macro environment cooperate.

- The 2024 approval of spot ETFs changed the structure. ETF inflows have far exceeded new issuance, raising the possibility that the cycle breaks down.

How the four-year cycle and the halving work

Bitcoin issues new coins as a reward to miners, but this reward is programmed to be cut in half every 210,000 blocks (roughly four years). That is the halving. The total supply is capped at 21 million coins, and as halvings repeat, the pace of issuance gradually approaches zero.

The four-year-cycle theory focuses on this mechanism of "supply being tightened at regular intervals." If new supply (part of the selling pressure) shrinks while demand stays the same, the supply-demand balance tightens and prices become more likely to rise — this is the supply-shock hypothesis. Viewed on a timeline, the phases of the market appear to have flipped around each halving, which is why people have described the cycle as "completing every four years."

The detailed mechanics of the halving itself are covered in What is the halving, and the timing of the next one in When is the next halving.

Testing the past three cycles on a timeline

Lining up the past halvings with the highs and lows that followed produces the table below (prices are approximate and for reference only — check each data source for exact values).

CycleHalving dateReward changeSubsequent high (approx.)Timing of peakHalving → peak
1stNov 28, 201250→25 BTC~$1,100Nov 2013~12 months
2ndJul 9, 201625→12.5 BTC~$19,700Dec 2017~17 months
3rdMay 11, 202012.5→6.25 BTC~$69,000Nov 2021~18 months
4thApr 20246.25→3.125 BTC(in progress)

Each peak was followed by a large decline (a bear market). The years 2014–2015, 2018, and 2022 each saw drops on the order of 70–80% from the highs. In other words, the objective fact is that the past looked like a rhythm of "peak the year after the halving → bottom the year after that → rally again." You can follow the longer price history in The history of Bitcoin.

The supply-shock theory — and its limits

In theory, the halving is an event that "reduces the amount of new coins entering the market." If fewer freshly mined coins are sold by miners, then all else being equal the supply-demand balance tightens. Up to that point, the explanation is reasonable.

But there are important caveats.

  • Everyone knows the halving is coming in advance. Under the efficient-market view, a known event tends to be priced in ahead of time, so it is unlikely to cause a spike on the day itself. Indeed, past halvings saw little movement on the actual day.
  • There have only been three samples. Three matches is statistically weak grounds for calling something a "law," and coincidence or overlap with macro factors (monetary easing, liquidity) cannot be ruled out.
  • Demand is essential for a rally. Even if supply falls, prices won't rise without buyers. Past rallies coincided with accommodative monetary conditions and waves of new entrants.

注意

This article is educational commentary, not investment advice. There is no guarantee that "prices must rise because of the halving," nor any guarantee that past patterns will repeat in the future. Crypto assets are highly volatile and can fall sharply over short periods. Always make investment decisions yourself, invest only what you can afford to lose, and check the latest primary sources.

How ETF inflows could break the pattern

In January 2024, the U.S. SEC approved spot Bitcoin ETFs. This made it easy for institutional investors and individuals — who had not previously been central buyers — to invest in Bitcoin from a securities account.

This is where it matters for the four-year-cycle argument. The new issuance the halving removes is on the order of a few hundred BTC per day, but it is not unusual for ETF inflows to exceed that many times over on a single day. In other words, a growing view holds that the main driver of price is shifting from "the thin stream of mining supply" to "the thick stream of institutional money." If so, the price rhythm would be strongly influenced by the macro economy (interest rates, liquidity) and ETF flows, and the clean four-year cycle anchored to the halving may break down.

On the other hand, because the fact that supply keeps shrinking does not change, some argue the "cycle may weaken but won't disappear." There is no settled answer — which is precisely why the safest assumption is that "the next one may not be the same."

Frequently asked questions

Q. Is the four-year cycle guaranteed to hold? A. No. The past three cases were similar, but the sample is small and no causal link has been proven. There is also the counterargument that, being a known event, it is already priced in — it is a "tendency," not a "law."

Q. Will the price definitely rise once the halving arrives? A. There is no guarantee. Even if supply falls, prices won't rise without buying demand and a supportive macro environment. Past rallies also coincided with accommodative monetary conditions.

Q. When is the next halving? A. It is expected around 2028 (at block height 1,050,000, the reward drops from 3.125 to 1.5625 BTC). Because it shifts with the pace of block production, check the exact schedule in The next halving.

Q. Now that ETFs exist, is the cycle already over? A. It can't be stated definitively. Some point out that ETF inflows have overtaken new issuance to become the main price driver, while others believe the effect of falling supply remains. The reasonable takeaway is that it may no longer behave as it did before.

Sources

Sources

  1. Bitcoin.org — Bitcoin開発ドキュメント(発行スケジュール)
  2. CoinGecko — Bitcoin Halving Countdown
  3. SEC — Statement on the Approval of Spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Products (2024年1月)
  4. Kraken — The history of Bitcoin halving
  5. CoinGecko Research — When Bitcoin All-Time Highs happen

FAQ

Is the four-year cycle guaranteed to hold?
No. The past three cases were similar, but the sample is small and no causal link has been proven. There is also the counterargument that, as a known event, the halving is already priced in — making it a tendency, not a law.
Will the price definitely rise once the halving arrives?
There is no guarantee. Even if supply falls, prices won't rise without buying demand and a supportive macro environment. Past rallies also coincided with accommodative monetary conditions.
When is the next halving?
It is expected around 2028 (at block height 1,050,000, the reward drops from 3.125 to 1.5625 BTC). Because it shifts with the pace of block production, confirm the exact schedule using official data.
Now that ETFs exist, is the four-year cycle already over?
It can't be stated definitively. Some argue ETF inflows have overtaken new issuance to become the main price driver, while others believe the effect of falling supply remains. The reasonable view is that it may no longer behave as it did before.
BIT NEWS Editorial
  • Japan-based editorial team
  • Primary sources, cited
  • Variable facts dated

The BIT NEWS editorial desk. We work from primary sources and date every claim that can change.

This article is informational only and is not financial, investment, or trading advice. Prices are reference snapshots and may be outdated. Always do your own research.